That if you denoise first and then paste over develop edits, you don't get the same output (except with less noise) and there are color shifts. I've noticed similar behavior with Lightroom. ![]() I’m going to try a few other files, but it is more convenient to denoise after if needed. I noticed the lens corrections seemed to be stripped from the raw. Hmmmm… the denoise output file is a dng, so still raw, but maybe capture one is not applying the same color conversion to the dng raw. Most of the time, for my work flow, I find that careful use of image enhancement, sharpening and noise reduction in Camera Raw before Photoshop works best for me, unless the image is really blurry or needs to be greatly enlarged. The history brush can also be used to restore areas that have artifacts.įolks who apply the filters outside of Photoshop probably have different experiences. One thing I figured out is that some bright artifacts can be reduced by using the "fade" command after applying the filter, changing the filter mode to "darken." The sharpening effect is lessened, but still there, while overly bright edges and strange patterns are minimized. ![]() For urban landscape and lots of textures (painted or weathered surfaces, for instance), they tend to cause too many artifacts, sometimes making them basically unusable. I've been using these programs in Photoshop for years, and I think their value in that program depends on the type of image. ![]() Simple test of Lightroom/Topaz Denoise/Topaz AI Clear.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |